2vs2 or 3vs3

What would you like to see in the SCDA SvM, 3vs3 or 2vs2? I personaly can't imagain how 3vs3 will work, but im sure it will be cool. 2vs2 on the other side is a working concept but maybe 3vs3 is good for a change? Discuss! king

Btw, does anyone know if 3vs3 or 2vs2 is comfirmed already?

S.a.S-Frelli wrote:: What would you like to see in the SCDA SvM, 3vs3 or 2vs2? I personaly can't imagain how 3vs3 will work, but im sure it will be cool. 2vs2 on the other side is a working concept but maybe 3vs3 is good for a change? Discuss!

Btw, does anyone know if 3vs3 or 2vs2 is comfirmed already?

I hope for 2v2 or it will be hard.

Cause if 3v3 what teams would it be? I would never leave Frelli, and I don't think he would leave me either. Like Solidus, me and Frelli then Snakebit would be alone. Just an example.

queen

Guest

Agree whit sunshine, well hope so there will be no 3v3... or ubi will Die What a Face

Edit: well if there is 3v3 i would like to get Vedhoc,Predator,Venom,Mosar to 3rd in my and snakebit team.

Guest

I Think we will take predator couse he was my old m8 in pt and it would be fun with both of them to play .

Guest

hope so he comes back.

Number of posts : 31 Localisation : Finland Registration date : 2006-04-13

Call me crazy but i'd like to see how 4vs4 would work . I don't like number 3 Mad

and usually agents work in pairs so here you could have 2 pairs in each team doing "inner" teamwork inside the pair of spies/mercs and "outer" teamwork between the pairs. Some required gameplay changes:

-bigger maps (claritysoft, anyone?)
-better communication and planningsystem (ingame ATC or something similar)
-Big emphasize on splitting the spies so that i won't end into 4vs1 rush kill rush kill rush kill fest. (for example: effective weapons to counter bigger manpower for mercs, bonus for hacking stuff all around the map etc.)

Number of posts : 36 Localisation : LIEK? Registration date : 2006-04-13

i like that idea.. that spies got 10 minutes to get points.. not 10 minutes to agro 3 objectives.. and maybe 4 vs 4.. --> 2 sectors... 2vs2 in each sector with teamplay (buttons for opening doors in the other sector ) between the teams? Smile

Globe wrote:: Call me crazy

You are crazy Razz

OH i hope there will be 2vs2.3vs3 can be so unballanced

Number of posts : 36 Localisation : LIEK? Registration date : 2006-04-13

S.a.S-Scorpion wrote:: OH i hope there will be 2vs2.3vs3 can be so unballanced

how do you know that? maybe its lots more balanced.. there is no info about 3vs3..

The main prob with 3vs3 is that if there is still so few players who play regularly it will be REALLY hard to get a game going.

Concerning the balance issues, I'll wait to see.

Number of posts : 49 Registration date : 2006-04-16

I can imagine 3vs3 very good... teamwork with two mates and much more possibilities to make tactics. Smile

Number of posts : 31 Localisation : Finland Registration date : 2006-04-13

The more players you add into the game, more easily you make balancing and gameplay errors as a developer. But in the same time, the funfactor raises if they do it correctly. It's kinda gamble.

EDIT: Just thinking, would adding 4 players to the old 2vs2 make things too complicated to even the best of the pro's? rabbit

Number of posts : 49 Registration date : 2006-04-16

Quote :: But in the same time, the funfactor raises if they do it correctly. It's kinda gamble.

I agree with that Twisted Evil

I think that 3vs3 will be great. We are playing in versus Mode in CT, so in DA we will also be anyway.

I think, that ubisoft knows what is doing .....

(I Hope)

Ok..now we know it will be 3vs3 ... ah btw ...probably no co-op moves in it Sad

.